SVOTER INFORMATION PAMPHLET

MEASURES, ANALYSES AND ARGUMENTS

(whichever is applicable to your ballot)

Arguments in support of, or in opposition to, the proposed laws are the opinions of the authors.

Shall the City of Watsonville adopt an ordinance adding Section 6-3.443 to the Watsonville Municipal Code requiring that substances added to the public water supply

for purposes other than to make water safe satisfy two new standards: (a) approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for specified purposes, and (b) cannot contain contaminants at concentrations exceeding either the U.S. Maximum Contaminant Level Goals or California Public Health Goals, whichever is more restrictive?

Impartial Analysis BY CITY ATTORNEY

Measure S

Watsonville operates a public water system with over 13,000 service connections. The City is subject to water quality standards established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and the California State Department of Health Services. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) does not regulate additives to public water supplies.

The 1974 federal Safe Water Drinking Act establishes national quality standards for drinking water. That Act requires the “EPA” to establish national public drinking water standards and prohibits states from relaxing those standards. The “EPA” has set standards for a number of substances in public water supplies, including fluoride.

The California Legislature has enacted the California Safe Drinking Water Act. That Act requires the California Department of Health Services to regulate substances in drinking water. In 1995, the legislature added Section 116410 to the Act (California Health & Safety Code Section 116410). Section 116410 requires the Department of Health Services to adopt standards for fluoridation of public drinking water. In 1997, the Department of Health Services promulgated regulations requiring cities with more than 10,000 water service connections (like Watsonville) to fluoridate their public water systems if a source of funds becomes available to pay for both the capital costs of the fluoridation equipment and the operation and maintenance costs.

In 2002, the California Dental Foundation awarded the City of Watsonville a $946,000 grant to pay for the installation of fluoridation facilities and the first year of operation of the fluoridation system. After that funding became available, the Department of Health Services notified the City that the City must fluoridate its water supply. The City Council has directed the City Public Works and Utilities Director to take the necessary steps to implement a public water fluoridation program in Watsonville.

This measure would amend the Watsonville Municipal Code by making it unlawful to add any substance to the public water supply to treat or affect the physical or mental functions of the body unless the substance meets two tests. First, the substance must have been specifically approved by the “FDA” for safety and effectiveness with a safety margin that protects all adverse health and cosmetic effects at all ranges of consumption. Second, at maximum use levels, the substance must contain no contaminants or concentrations exceeding U.S. Maximum Contaminant Level Goals or California Public Health Goals, whichever is more protective. Since the “FDA” has never regulated fluoride nor specifically approved its use, this Measure would prohibit the addition of fluoride to the City’s water supply.

Both the California Attorney General’s Office and the Legislative Counsel of California have issued legal opinion letters saying that if a measure like this is adopted in Watsonville, it would conflict with and be pre-empted by State law thereby making it unenforceable. No court of law has yet ruled on this issue however. Until a court of law makes such a ruling, the two opinions are only indicators of its legality, not binding on the City.

In order to be adopted, the Measure must be approved by a majority of the voters voting on it.

s/ Alan Smith

City Attorney

 

 

 

 

FULL TEXT OF BALLOT MEASURE S

AN ORDINANCE BY THE VOTERS TO ADD SECTION 6-3.443 TO ARTICLE 4 (WATER SERVICE PROVISIONS) OF CHAPTER 3 (CITY UTILITIES) OF TITLE 6 (SANITATION AND HEALTH) OF THE WATSONVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO ADDITIVES TO THE PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY

 

SECTION 1. ENACTMENT.

Article 4 (Water Service Provisions) of Chapter 3 (City Utilities) of Title 6 (Sanitation and Health) of the Watsonville Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding Section 6-3.443 to read as follows:

6-3.443 Additives to the Public Water Supply.

In order to ensure that the public water of Watsonville is safe to drink, it shall be unlawful and a public nuisance for any person, agent, or any public or private water system, to add any product, substance, or chemical to the public water supply for the purpose of treating or affecting the physical or mental functions of the body of any person, rather than to make water safe or potable, unless the substance meets the following criteria:

(a)     The substance must have been specifically approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for safety and effectiveness with a margin of safety that is protective for all adverse health and cosmetic effects at all ranges of unrestricted consumption.

(b)     The substance, at Maximum Use Levels, must contain no contaminants at concentrations that exceed U.S. Maximum Contaminant Level Goals or California Public Health Goals, whichever is more protective.

SECTION 2. SEVERABILITY.

If any provision of this Article or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the Article which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Article are severable.

SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

This Ordinance shall be in force and take effect ten (10) days after the official canvass of the November 5, 2002, Special Municipal Election pursuant to California Election Code Section 4013.

 

 

 

 

44-516

 

VOTER INFORMATION PAMPHLET

MEASURES, ANALYSES AND ARGUMENTS

(whichever is applicable to your ballot)

Arguments in support of, or in opposition to, the proposed laws are the opinions of the authors.

ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT OF MEASURE S

This ordinance establishes criteria, and assures, that should the City or any other entity choose to add a substance to our drinking water for the specific purpose of treating people rather than water, before exposing consumers to the substance for the rest of our lives, the actual substance chosen to be placed in the water must have gone through the appropriate approval process by the FDA for the health claim made, as the FDA requires for any other substance intended to treat people. 

Obviously, there is a vast range in how much water individuals consume. This ordinance requires that any substance chosen for the purpose of treating humans must be approved for safety and effectiveness at all ranges of actual water consumption, not an arbitrary one liter per day.

This ordinance also requires that any substance chosen to be added to our public water supplies to fulfill a health claim not contain excessive levels of contaminants such as lead, arsenic, mercury, cadmium and other toxic elements for which our water department is already committed to minimizing.

This ordinance does not require that the FDA monitor public drinking water, or substances that make water safe or more drinkable. Nor does this ordinance conflict with State or local laws calling for fluoridation.

However, opposition by promoters of fluoridation poses an important question: Why would anyone truly concerned about the welfare of children fight so hard to expose children, and all other consumers, to a substance with no toxicological data, unapproved for the health claims presented, and containing contaminants above already established public health goals?

Protect all citizens of Watsonville, at every economic level, from the addition of untested products containing excessive levels of contaminants to our drinking water under the guise of better health.

Vote Yes for safe drinking water!!

www.Keepers-of-the-Well.org

s/ Judy Doering Nielsen, Council Member, City of Watsonville

s/ Juanita Martinez

s/ Nick Bulaich

s/ Dan Hernandez

s/ Karell Reader

 

 

 

ARGUMENT AGAINST MEASURE S

Measure S may sound good, but don't be fooled. It's misleading, deceptive, and bad for Watsonville.

Supporters use scary-sounding language and suggest we need Measure S to protect Watsonville's water. They're wrong.

Our water is already safe to drink. Water systems like ours are governed by strict federal and state regulations, and are regularly tested.

What's more, the Food and Drug Administration mentioned in Measure S has absolutely nothing to do with public water systems. Measure S sounds official, but it makes no sense.

What the proponents DON'T tell you is their real goal – to block water fluoridation for our community.

That's a real disservice, because Watsonville is facing a major crisis of dental disease. A recent school-based screening found untreated dental decay in 75% of Watsonville's elementary students – three times the national average!

The good news is that this crisis can be significantly avoided with fluoridation.

Water fluoridation is a safe, economical and effective way of promoting dental health for children and adults. More than 162 million people in the United States already enjoy its benefits. Watsonville residents deserve fluoridation too!

Experience in other communities shows a 20 - 60% reduction in tooth decay with fluoridation.  The California Dental Association estimates that every dollar invested in fluoridation saves $140 in dental bills.

Fluoridation is supported by individuals and organizations who are knowledgeable and trustworthy: the American Medical Association, Center for Disease Control, and every U.S. Surgeon General for the past 50 years.

Last year our City Council wisely voted to approve fluoridation, with overwhelming support from local dentists, doctors and people from all walks of life.

Measure S attempts to stop fluoridation with misleading claims and impossible proposals. It puts the city at risk of costly legal challenges, and undermines community health.

VOTE NO on Measure S.

s/ Dr. Janet Bell, Retired Watsonville pediatrician

s/ Bruce Woolpert, President and CEO, Graniterock

s/ Dr. Art Dover, Watsonville pediatrician

s/ Theresa Ontiveros, Manager, Planned Parenthood - Clinica Mariposa

s/ Dr. Barry Staley, Dentist, Dientes! Community Dental Clinic

 

44-517