UVOTER INFORMATION PAMPHLET

MEASURES, ANALYSES AND ARGUMENTS

(whichever is applicable to your ballot)

Arguments in support of, or in opposition to, the proposed laws are the opinions of the authors.

Shall the City of Watsonville amend the Watsonville 2005 General Plan thereby imposing certain restrictions on growth, as specified, and restricting later amendments all

as provided in the Watsonville Urban Limit Line and Development Timing Initiative?

A “yes” vote is a vote to adopt the Measure.

A “no” vote is a vote not to adopt the Measure.

In order to be adopted, the Measure must be approved by a majority of the voters voting on it.

s/ Alan Smith

City Attorney

 

 

 

 

 

The statement above is an impartial analysis of Measure U.

If you desire a copy of the Measure,

please call the City Clerk’s Office at

(831) 728-6005

and a copy will be mailed at no cost to you.

Impartial Analysis BY CITY ATTORNEY

Measure U

The Watsonville Urban Limit Line and Development Timing Initiative (“Measure”) would amend the City’s General Plan to define a new Urban Limit Line (“ULL”) and make related changes to General Plan policies and land use designations.  The new ULL would consist of three segments: a Twenty Year ULL, a Twenty-Five Year ULL, and a Westerly ULL.  For specific areas both inside and outside the ULL, the Measure also specifies the type and timing of development.

The City’s Existing General Plan: The City of Watsonville General Plan establishes permissible land uses within the City limits as well as a broader planning area around the City.  Development projects within the City limits must be consistent with the General Plan.  In May 1994, the City Council amended the City’s General Plan to adopt the Watsonville ULL. The ULL establishes a boundary beyond which the City will not permit urban development and will not extend City services.

Effect of the Measure: The Measure would define a new ULL, readopt and reaffirm related policies in the General Plan, and redesignate certain areas to coincide with the new ULL.  The Measure would adopt new General Plan policies specifying the type and timing of development in seven specific areas inside the ULL.  It would also amend the General Plan Land Use Diagram to show the new ULL, redesignated areas, and areas subject to the phased development policies.  The Measure would also establish policies to direct urban development within the ULL and to protect agriculture on lands outside the ULL.  With certain exceptions, any changes to the ULL or to the policies proposed by the Measure would require a vote of the people.

Exceptions:  The Measure would authorize the City Council to amend the ULL without voter approval in the following circumstances: 1) during regular updates of the City General Plan, but only if the policies adopted by this Measure are retained; 2) if the amended boundary is inside the limits of the ULL established by the Measure; 3) if the Council finds that application of the ULL constitutes an unconstitutional taking; or 4) if the Santa Cruz County Local Agency Formation Commission does not amend the Watsonville Sphere of Influence to a configuration substantially corresponding to the ULL or approve annexations corresponding to the Measure’s policies concerning timing of development.  Amendments to the Twenty Year ULL would not require voter approval after November 1, 2022, and amendments to the Twenty-Five Year ULL or Westerly ULL would not require voter approval after November 1, 2027. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

44-520

VOTER INFORMATION PAMPHLET

MEASURES, ANALYSES AND ARGUMENTS

(whichever is applicable to your ballot)

Arguments in support of, or in opposition to, the proposed laws are the opinions of the authors.

ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE U

Dear Watsonville Voter:

Please join us in voting YES on Measure U, the Watsonville Urban Limit Line and Development Timing Initiative.

Measure U provides orderly growth and agricultural protection for the City of Watsonville.

Your YES vote on Measure U will help:

·    protect farmland

·    ensure space for housing and jobs

·    preserve our beautiful local environment

This initiative was proposed after 3 years of discussion and compromise by hundreds of Watsonville residents expressing their hopes for the future of our community.

What came out of those discussions was something unique: a plan that balances growth and preservation.

The success of this plan is shown by the local community organizations supporting Measure U:

·    Santa Cruz County Farm Bureau

·    Monterey Bay Central Labor Council, AFL-CIO

·    Watsonville Wetlands Watch

·    Pajaro Valley Chamber of Commerce

·    Latino Chamber of Commerce of Santa Cruz County

·    League of United Latin American Citizens of Watsonville/Santa Cruz County

·    Watsonville Association of Realtors

·    Community Alliance with Family Farmers

·    Watsonville City Council

·    Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors

·    Action Pajaro Valley

Measure U protects the good things about Watsonville, and makes room for phased growth to meet our future needs.

Why is this plan on the ballot? Because something this important should be decided by the people.

Your YES vote on Measure U will enhance our quality of life by:

·    Preserving our viable agricultural land

·    Allowing some room in our small town for new housing and jobs

·    Protecting the long-term health of our unique natural resources

We think Watsonville is a special place. Don't you agree? Let's keep it that way... for our children and future generations!

Please Vote YES on U.

s/ Betty Bobeda, Mayor, City of Watsonville

s/ Jim Rider, Board Member, Santa Cruz County Farm Bureau

s/ Rebecca J. Garcia, K-12 Administrator, Community College Trustee

s/ Ana Ventura Phares, City Councilmember, City of Watsonville

s/ Chris Johnson-Lyons, Founding Board Member, Watsonville Wetlands Watch

 

ARGUMENT AGAINST MEASURE U

Measure U, the Growth Initiative, is unnecessary and will NOT benefit the majority of Watsonville residents.  Passage of the initiative promotes urban sprawl into existing agricultural areas and will place a significant strain on the resources of the Pajaro Valley.  While the Initiative allows for the creation of additional housing, most of the homes will not be affordable to the typical Watsonville resident, attracting instead people from outside the area.  The service improvements that will be needed for development of the annexed areas will create additional costs for city residents.  Who really benefits from this Initiative?

Urban Limit Lines (ULL) are usually established to prevent sprawl and protect natural resources.  In this case however, the proposed ULL includes sprawl into prime agricultural land.  Passage of this Initiative actually defeats its stated intention -- protection and preservation of agricultural lands. 

Measure U will not address the critical housing needs described in the Housing Element of the City of Watsonville’s General Plan.  Instead it will likely entice people to relocate from outside the area, thereby increasing the local population and exacerbating issues that plague the Pajaro Valley and its residents, including:

·    Increased traffic on already congested roadways,

·    Continued over-drafting of water resources,

·    Placing an additional burden on already overcrowded schools, and

·    Destruction of open space, agricultural land and sensitive environmental areas.

The unmet housing needs should be mitigated within the current city boundaries, through infill and neighborhood redevelopment.  Services and resources need to be addressed and prioritized for existing residents. Extending the ULL is unnecessary; improving existing conditions is imperative.

A "no" vote on Measure U will require the City of Watsonville to improve and maintain housing within the city limits and focus on the creation of needed jobs and homes for local residents.

Friends of Buena Vista

s/ Bert Post, Member, Steering Committee

s/ Karin Kerber-Smith, Member, Steering Committee

s/ Bill Bruce, Member, Steering Committee

s/ Kim Shirley, Member, Steering Committee

s/ Tom Smith, Member, Steering Committee

 

 

44-521